HomeStandards
Standards that cansurvive scrutiny.
Standards · drafts for adoption
The Code must be more than a ceremonial document. Its power comes from enforceable methods and meaningful institutional consequences. Four layers, each with a clear job; specialist roles also follow their own professional rules and local law.
§ 01The hierarchy
Four layers, from duty to specialist schedule.
Code of Neutral Practice™
Professional duties and ethics; objective disclosures; confidentiality; competence; integrity; misconduct reporting; technology responsibility; conduct jurisdiction.
Draft 1.0Neutral Practice Standard™
For all endorsed roles: written mandates, continuing conflicts, professional care, lawful data handling, equitable process and role clarity.
Draft 1.0Neutral Evaluation Standard™
Defined question, evidence, reasoned report, limitations, commissioning disclosures and the three protocols A, B and C.
Draft 1.0Role and jurisdiction protocols
ENE, determination, mediation, arbitration, standing neutrals, ombuds, expert investigation, regulated activities and local legal restrictions.
Schedules§ 02The texts
Five texts, version 1.0, in draft.
- Independent Neutral Evaluation™ StandardHow an independent evaluation is mandated, conducted, calibrated and reported. Read with Part III of the Handbook of Neutral Practice™.01
- Neutral Practice Standard™The common standard for every neutral function: the Compass, the lifecycle and the role taxonomy of the Handbook.02
- Conflict Disclosure StandardSearch broadly. Assess carefully. Disclose what trust requires.03
- Code of Neutral Practice™Ten principles that govern acceptance, conduct, judgment, communication, records and corrective action. Part II of the Handbook.04
- Cross-Border Neutral Practice™Shared principles, read with local law.05
§ 03Ask the Standards
Ask a question. Get the text.
Connecting…
Ask the Standards.
Answers come only from the institution’s published texts, with the source shown. If the standards are silent, it says so.