Solutions / Dispute Types

Insolvency disputesdemand independent evaluation fast.

Insolvency proceedings generate disputes between creditors, between creditors and officeholders, and between insolvent entities and their counterparties. INDS™ evaluation provides the structured, independent assessment that helps parties navigate complex multi-stakeholder situations.

Request evaluation →Find a neutral

INDS™ PathwayPreventionEvaluationExpert Det.MediationArbitration

Common dispute types

What brings parties to TheNeutrals.ORG™.

Every matter is different. What is consistent is the INDS™ methodology applied to evaluate it — six stages, four sub-frameworks, independent of all parties.

Creditor priority disputes

Creditors dispute the order and extent of their claims. INDS™ independently evaluates the financial record and legal-aligned position.

Officeholder disputes

Disputes between liquidators, administrators, or receivers and counterparties about asset valuations, transactions at undervalue, or preference payments.

Director liability claims

Claims against directors for wrongful trading, misfeasance, or breach of fiduciary duty. INDS™ evaluates the factual and governance record.

Transaction avoidance

Claims to set aside transactions made before insolvency. INDS™ assesses the factual basis and strategic pathway.

Cross-border insolvency

Multi-jurisdiction insolvency proceedings with conflicts between national regimes and creditor classes. INDS™ cross-border evaluation capability.

Restructuring disputes

Disputes arising during formal or informal restructuring — debt reductions, equity conversions, creditor agreements.

How INDS™ handles this

Six stages. Every time. No exceptions.

INDS™ is the proprietary six-stage evaluation system that powers every TheNeutrals.ORG™ engagement. Each stage is mandatory. Each sub-framework is applied. The output is an 11-section report with executive summary, risk grid, settlement feasibility score, and strategic pathway.

Request evaluation → About INDS™

Intake & Issue Definition

Scope confirmed. Conflict checks done. Complexity classified.

Neutral Information Gathering

All documents collected. Factual chronology built.

Stakeholder & Behavioural Assessment

INDS-BF™ applied. All 10 behavioural signals mapped.

Evidence & Risk Analysis

INDS-RG™ Risk Grid. Five dimensions scored Low/Moderate/High.

Strategy & Settlement Feasibility

INDS-SFM™ scored 1–10. Primary path + alternatives defined.

Final Evaluation Report