Solutions / Global Corporations

Dispute resolution at the
scale of your business.

Global corporations face disputes that cross borders, involve multiple parties, and carry reputational as well as financial risk. The Neutrals provides the people, the INDS™ process, the behavioural intelligence of GBI™, and the institutional framework to match your scale — and protect your interests from the moment a commercial relationship begins.

Appoint a Neutral → GC Retainer Programme UNIONE COMMISSION™

1,500+

Certified Neutrals

80+

Countries

24hr

Priority appointment (retainer)

INDS™

Every evaluation

The problem we solve

Your internal teams see every dispute through their own lens. No single team sees the complete picture.

In most corporations, procurement sees cost and continuity. Legal sees risk and compliance — and often escalates faster than necessary. Sales sees customer retention. HR sees behaviour. Operations sees delivery. Leadership receives multiple conflicting reports and no neutral, unified assessment.

This is not incompetence. It is structural. And it means that by the time a dispute reaches the board, it is already in its late-middle stage — positions have hardened, advisors have been instructed, and the commercial relationship is under serious threat.

The Neutrals provides what no internal team can: a single, independent, cross-functional assessment — powered by INDS™ — that gives leadership the complete, unbiased picture before any of that happens.

What is INE? → UNIONE COMMISSION™

The 8 questions INE answers for your leadership

What actually happened?Neutral fact reconstruction — independent of all internal narratives

Where does responsibility lie?Independent allocation — not the legal team's view, not HR's

What are the financial risks?Exposure quantified — not estimated or filtered through departments

What behavioural dynamics are driving this?The human side — which 70%+ of escalation traces back to

How strong is each side's position?Factual strength and leverage — scored neutrally

How likely is settlement?INDS-SFM™ Settlement Feasibility Score — before a single meeting is scheduled

What is the safest strategy?Three pathways — primary, alternative A, alternative B — with timelines

Is legal escalation necessary?The most important question — answered before your lawyers are briefed

Our methodology for corporates

We are present from the moment a commercial relationship begins.

Most ADR institutions arrive after the fire has started. The Neutrals arrives when the building is being designed. GBI™ identifies behavioural risk in partner networks before disputes form. INDS™ evaluates them scientifically when they do. CPRS™ — through the UNIONE COMMISSION™ — builds the prevention architecture across your entire partner ecosystem.

Stage 01

Pre-Contract

Evaluate before you commit. Risk identification, term analysis, counterparty assessment. Prevention starts here.

Stage 02

During Performance

Monitor, protect, advise. Continuous neutral presence — catching friction before it becomes conflict.

Stage 03

First Friction

Evaluate before positions harden. Independent assessment of facts, merits, and options. Most cases resolve here.

Stage 04

Dispute Stage

INDS™ evaluation before any proceeding. Clarity, risk scoring, settlement feasibility — all before mediation or arbitration.