Independent expert evaluation before any formal step. Clarity on merits, risk, and the realistic range of outcomes — from $200.
Explore NES →Seven instruments. One methodology. Arbitration is always the last resort — every instrument before it is designed to prevent it.
Explore DRS →1,329+ certified neutrals. 80+ countries. 12 sector benches. Exclusive by design — maximum 10 per sector per country.
The Profession →Independent. Impartial. International.™ The global home of trusted neutrals — governed by the Global Council, powered by INDS™.
About the Institution →
Evaluate
Independent Neutral Evaluation (INE™)11-section NER report · INDS™ governed→ Clarity Snapshot™ — $200Fast-track · 3–5 days→ Standing NeutralPrevention from contract execution→ INDS™ Methodology→Who We Serve
For General Counsel→ For Global Corporations→ For SMEs — from $2,500→ For Lawyers & Legal Firms→ For Construction & Infrastructure→ For International Trade→Resolution Instruments
MediationFrom $800 · Singapore Convention · 56+ countries→ Expert DeterminationBinding · From $2,000→ Neutral Chairing→ Arbitration (Last resort)NY Convention · 164 countries→Prevention
CPRS™ Corporate Prevention→ Dispute System Design→ Neutral Appointing Service→12 Sectors
Construction & Infrastructure→ Banking & Finance→ All 12 Sectors — Full Directory→Join the Bench
Apply for Certification — Free5–7 days · Pay only on approval→ For Neutrals — Overview→ Governance & Ethics→Learn
The Neutrals AcademyCPD-accredited · Foundation to Advanced→ The Neutrals Connect→ Insights & Thought Leadership→ World Neutrals Summit 2026Barcelona · August 2026 · 75 spots→Already Certified?
My Dashboard→ My Bench Profile→
CLARITY
BEFORE ANY DECISION.
The Independent Neutral Evaluation — an INDS™-powered corporate intelligence product. The NER report gives boards, General Counsel, and leadership an objective expert view before committing to any course of action. We do not resolve disputes. We define them.
Not Advice. Not Mediation. Evaluation.
Independent Neutral Evaluation is not a resolution process. It does not settle disputes. It does not advise on strategy. It defines the dispute — objectively, impartially, and precisely — so that whoever reads the Neutral Evaluation Report has the clearest possible picture of where they stand.
The NER gives leadership the intelligence to make informed decisions: whether to negotiate, mediate, arbitrate, settle, or walk away. Most organisations make escalation decisions without this intelligence. Most regret it.
Two Tracks. One Methodology.
Early-stage intelligence when speed matters. Structured review of documents and position statements. Condensed 5-section NER delivered within 5 business days. For matters up to $2M in dispute value.
For complex, high-value, or multi-party disputes. Full INDS™ six-stage assessment, document discovery review, witness or expert submissions, and the complete 11-section NER with post-report debrief.
11 Sections. One Complete Picture.
The Neutral Evaluation Report is the product of every INE™ engagement. Structured across 11 sections — written in plain language accessible to boards and non-lawyers. Not a legal opinion. Not a recommendation. The clearest possible view of the dispute.
Built for Corporate Leadership.
The NER gives GC teams an independent view that can be presented to boards without the appearance of advocacy. You cannot be both adviser and neutral — the NER resolves that tension.
Most escalation decisions are made on one side's internal legal assessment. The NER provides the independent benchmark that boards need to make properly informed decisions.
The NER's commercial exposure and PRHI™ sections give finance leadership precise, probability-weighted dispute exposure — not legal language, but financial intelligence.
Neutral Evaluation Centres provide infrastructure for organisations wanting institutionalised INE™ access — embedded in governance frameworks, on retainer, activated by trigger conditions.
Law firms use the NER to give clients an independent sanity-check on case merits and settlement value — positioned as a complement to legal advice, not a substitute.
For matters heading toward formal proceedings, Clarity DeepView™ provides the evaluative framework that allows parties to test settlement options before arbitration costs begin.
Clarity Costs Less Than Confusion.
A single Neutral Evaluation Report costs a fraction of one poorly informed escalation decision. Most organisations spend that in a week of litigation — and never get the clarity they needed at the start.